Sunday, June 30, 2019

Innocence Project Impact

The Innocence Project recently posted a video to Youtube that includes snippets of interviews with multiple exonerees who were helped by the organization. The video is incredibly powerful as viewers hear directly from those who have benefited from the Innocence Project's assistance. The video subjects share their experiences in prison, how they stayed hopeful, and what it meant to them to have the Innocence Project on their side.

The video description reads "The Innocence Project has helped more than 200 people wrongly convicted people secure their freedom and prove their innocence. Here are a few of their stories including Archie Williams, John Nolley, Clemente Aguirre, Perry Lott, Huwe Burton, and Steven Mark Chaney."


The video, posted in late May, has just over 400 views. With such an important issue that affects so many, you would hope that these messages would be spread further. Hopefully with the increased fascination in wrongful conviction stories (as seen in multiple Netflix series), the Innocence Project will gain more attention for the important work they are dong.

Saturday, June 29, 2019

A bit on Mother Justice

I decided to edit a section of John Giuca's Wikipedia page. In 2003, Giuca was sentenced to 25 years to life for murdering a college student at a house party he had hosted. Several factors contribute to his wrongful conviction, most notably a lack of evidence and a surplus of juror and prosecutorial misconduct. 

Giuca's biggest supporter since his conviction has been his mother, Doreen Giuliano, who has relentlessly to prove his innocence by proving that there was in fact juror and prosecutorial misconduct. Because it was locked for edits, I was unable to edit Doreen's Wikipedia page, so instead I edited her relevant sections on John Giuca's page.

Original Wikipedia entry:  

Jason Allo 

Looking for evidence that could win her son a new trial, Giuliano investigated members of the jury.[2] By her account, she recalled a friend of her son's had said he recognized a shaven headed man on the jury. After somehow obtaining details of the jurors' addresses that are not officially available to the defendant, Giuliano targeted Jason Allo. Using the alias "Dee Quinn", Giuliano rented an apartment close to Allo's residence, transformed her appearance, and established a close relationship with him.[4] 
Giuliano secretly recorded their conversations. After nearly a year, she had collected audio of Allo allegedly talking of his biased attitudes towards Giuca, and connections to the case that should have disqualified him from serving on the jury.[11]

Updated Wikipedia entry:  

Jason Allo 

Looking for evidence that could win her son a new trial, Giuliano investigated members of the jury.[1] By her account, she recalled a friend of her son's had said he recognized a shaven headed man on the jury. After somehow obtaining details of the jurors' addresses that are not officially available to the defendant, Giuliano targeted Jason Allo. Using the alias "Dee Quinn", Giuliano rented an apartment close to Allo's residence, transformed her appearance, and established a close relationship with him.[2] 
Giuliano secretly recorded their conversations. After nearly a year, she had collected audio of Allo allegedly talking of his biased attitudes towards Giuca, and connections to the case that should have disqualified him from serving on the jury.[3] 
Doreen had Jason Allo's prejudices towards John Giuca recorded on tape. During the hearing however, the judge dismissed the recordings ruling that they were unreliable.   
Undeterred, Doreen tried again to find something from her son's trial that would prove that it was corrupt. This time, Doreen investigated those who testified against her son, starting with John Avitto, Giuca's former cell mate who testified under oath that John told him he committed the murder. While digging through files, Doreen found that the prosecutor on her son's case, Anna-Sigga Nicolazzi, met with Avitto before his testimony against Giuca. 
Nicolazzi had struck a deal with Avitto. If he testified against Guica, he would be able to walk free form his unrelated drug charges. Avitto has since recanted his testimony and in February 2018 four judges on the state appellate court agreed to reverse John Giuca's conviction, based on prosecutorial misconduct. 
John Giuca remains in prison on Riker's island as he waits his day in the NY State Appellate Court. The judge denied him both release and bail even after his conviction was reversed.
Doreen Giuliano's fight to prove her son's innocence is inspiring. After being ridiculed, and told to give up Doreen has never given up hope. She has gone through what some label extreme measures, to her she's just being a mother. 

Monday, June 24, 2019

Faces of Wrongful Conviction: Rodney Lincoln


In 1982, Rodney Lincoln was wrongfully convicted of the murder of JoAnn Tate and an attack on her two young daughters. Lincoln was convicted based on a combination of false testimony by the daughters who were young and coached into testifying by police, and incorrect DNA testing.

Rodney Lincoln at the time of his arrest

Since his incarceration, the daughters, who were the only eyewitnesses, have recanted their testimony saying that they support the exoneration and release of Rodney Lincoln. Despite multiple efforts for retrial, Lincoln was shot down time and time again. Finally, in 2018, the outgoing governor of Missouri commuted his sentence.

Rodney Lincoln 36 years after his wrongful conviction

Though his sentence was commuted and Rodney Lincoln was able to leave prison, his conviction was not overturned meaning that the court does not recognize his innocence. In a press release by the Midwest Innocence Project, Tricia Bushnell, Executive Director, wrote Lincoln’s story is “a big step toward justice, but until his conviction is overturned, justice is yet again denied.”


Sunday, June 23, 2019

5 Ways to Help

According to the resources from yesterday's post, here are 5 ways you can help with the issue of wrongful conviction.

  1. Donate money to organizations actively aiding the wrongfully convicted
  2. Educate yourself and others about the causes and reasons behind wrongful convictions
  3. Contact your state and federal representatives about the issue (Check out this link on how to do this)
  4. Reach out to news media to help spread awareness on specific cases (media attention helps move along the legal process, due to the pressure of the public's interest)
  5. Correspond with a prisoner or former prisoner who has been wrongfully convicted. Be sure to go through an organization like NCRJ
The best way to help out is to continue the conversation about wrongful convictions. Do your own research and educate yourself so as to best inform others.

Saturday, June 22, 2019

Who is helping the wrongfully convicted?

The below is a list of nonprofits and organizations that are actively aiding those who have been wrongfully convicted of crimes. Most of these organizations assist people with legal representation, both during and post exoneration. For a person who has been wrongfully convicted, it's a long road to freedom and these organizations are there to help along the way. 
All of these websites provide resources for those who have been wrongfully convicted as well as for their families. Each is linked above for you to learn more and explore what you can do as well. 

Tuesday, June 18, 2019

| FACES OF WRONGFUL CONVICTION : THE CENTRAL PARK 5 |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | THE CENTRAL PARK 5 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |  | | | | | | | | | | | | |  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |  | | | | | | | | | |  | | | | | | | | | |  | | | | | | | | | |  | | | | | |  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |  | | | | 

On April 19, 1989, a woman named Trisha Meli was brutally attacked and raped at the 102nd Street Crossing in Central Park. When her case went to trial 5 teenage boys were coerced police and prosecution into admitting that they were responsible for the attack. I would like to write another blog post in the future that goes further into detail about the case, but for now, here are the faces of the 5 boys who were wrongfully convicted: The Central Park 5.

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |   Kevin Richardson, Antron Mccray, Raymond Santana Jr., Korey Wise and Yusef Salaam | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 

Pictured at the time of their arrest

Pictured in 2019 at the premiere of the new docu-series, When They See Us

Since the release of When They See Us, The Central Park 5 have been thrust back into the spotlight. The case is being reopened by the media their audience-and the ramifications have already begun. The two lead prosecutors on the case, Linda Fairstein and Elizabeth Lederer have stepped down from their respective roles in nonprofits and at Columbia University. Though the Manhattan District Attorney has said they will not open an investigation into either Fairstein or Lederer, the public has made their opinions known. 

Monday, June 17, 2019

Serial Podcast (Season 1)

"How'd you get to work last Wednesday? Drive? Walk? Bike? Was it raining? Are you sure? 

Did you go to any stores that day? If so, what did you buy? Who did you talk to? The entire day, name every person you talked to. It's hard"

That's how Season 1 Episode 1 of the Serial podcast opens, and then host Sarah Koenig asks teenagers what they did on a Friday six weeks ago–without looking to their phones. Koenig does this to prove a point as part of her gripping storytelling method for this podcast, since the case that she unfolds heavily relies on teenagers' memories in the year 1999.

First airing in 2014, Serial the podcast took the nation by storm. Serial Season 1 told the story of the 1999 murder of Hae Min Lee, an 18 year old student in Baltimore. Since its air date, the podcast has been downloaded more than 175 million times. 

The podcast focuses its storytelling on Adnan Syed, Lee's former boyfriend and primary suspect in the murder. Syed was charged with first-degree murder and, after his first trial ended in a mistrial, he was found guilty after his second trial lasted six weeks.

Despite Syed consistently maintaining his innocence, a lack of evidence against him, questionable alibis, and a failure by the police to fully investigate all leads, Syed was sentenced to life in prison 

Serial Season 1 consists of twelve gripping episodes that unravel the investigation with Koenig promising to "follow up on long-dormant leads, recheck alibis, and question assumptions." 

When I first listened to Serial, I couldn't stop. I listened to it for hours with my entire family on a long car ride and have since gone back to reread episode transcripts in an attempt to fill in the gaps for myself. Serial brings out the inner investigator in all of us-full of twists and turns all based on fact. Full of new interviews with the key players, Serial is sure to entertain audiences of all backgrounds and interests. 

Tuesday, June 11, 2019

Our Justice System Needs Reformation

A few years ago Making a Murderer, a docuseries featuring the story of Steven Avery, premiered on Netflix. Steven Avery spent nearly two decades in prison for a rape he did not commit, only to be released and then convicted of killing photographer Teresa Halbach just two years after his release. Avery, along with his suspected accomplice, his 16-year old mentally disabled nephew Brendan Dassey, were sentenced to life in prison, without possibility of parole.

The show presented the case’s evidence and information, included interviews with those involved–including attorneys and members of the Avery and Dassey families–and included footage from Avery and Dassey’s police interrogations and trials in 2006 and 2007.  The series presented the case as mishandled, from an apparently corrupt sheriff’s department to seemingly incompetent attorneys to the possibility of evidence manipulation by police officers; Making a Murderer left the viewers questioning Avery and Dassey’s guilt.

The footage of the police’s interrogation of Brendan Dassey was especially concerning, as you could clearly see that Dassey was coerced into admitting guilt, even at one point explicitly told that if he told the officers what they wanted him to say, he could go home and watch his favorite show, WrestleMania. Dassey, then, told the officers that he helped his uncle kill Halbach; he subsequently was put into handcuffs, and removed from the interrogation room.

After watching the episode with Dassey’s interrogation, I got ready to go to sleep when all of a sudden I inexplicably broke into tears. I walked into my parents’ room, now a sobbing mess, and cried for Brendan Dassey. At the time of his conviction, he was only 16; the same age I was watching the show. I declared that he was clearly coerced and that his conviction was completely unfair. I imagined him, sitting in a jail cell for the rest of his life, his entire future now taken from him. He was just a kid–I imagined myself in his situation and continued to cry until I became exhausted and fell asleep.

The most upsetting part of Avery and Dassey’s cases is that similar outcomes are not rare, as people are convicted of crimes they did not commit much more often than one would like to think. The causes for wrongful incarceration vary, but no matter the reason, one thing is clear: The American justice system has failed far too many innocent people. Because it is impossible to definitively know whether a person is telling the truth or not, it is impossible to have an accurate statistic on just how many people sit behind bars for a crime they did not commit.  

After watching Making a Murderer and researching countless similar stories, one thing became clear: Our justice system needs reformation. Our justice system needs to convict those who are guilty–not those who are innocent. Our justice system needs adhere to its name and act justly.

No reform will ever be able to completely eliminate wrongful convictions because no system is perfect, but that should not mean that nothing can be done. The most effective and realistic reform for the American justice system is publicity for the wrongfully convicted, just like Netflix did for Steven Avery and Brendan Dassey–Making a Murderer garnered so much attention that a high profile lawyer has now volunteered to defend Avery. 

Attention and publicity are achieved by spreading the person's story, forcing the public to recognize that this is an issue that occurs on a much larger scale than is perceived. These reforms will not happen overnight; there is a long road ahead for the wrongfully convicted. Prisoners are often forgotten, and society’s trust in America’s justice system allows for this. In order for effective reform to occur, America must recognize the faults of the criminal justice system and fight for the lives of the wrongly convicted prisoners behind bars.